Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:51:18 05/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 19, 2001 at 21:28:25, Eric Tom wrote: >On May 19, 2001 at 19:06:11, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On May 19, 2001 at 15:34:15, william penn wrote: >> >>>i suspect that cm6555 would still score among the top three, even against the >>>best and newest programs. Cm8000 is a rip-off since there is a noticable >>>decrease in strength from the previous more strong version 6000 >> >>On what do you base that? >>And is it stronger than 6000 or 7000? >> >>And if it is a rip off, can there be any compensation, or money-back? >> >>S.Taylor > >Compensation? Maybe the recent amazing personalities, such as CMUtzinger and >CMFun can compensate, I don't know. I've recently fell in love with >CM8_Bendorz. > >Regards, >Eric A clear weakening of playing strength makes it questionable as an "upgrade" in my opinion. All other extras and improvements should NEVER be at the expense of playing strength, Unless specifically made clear. If it's simply not improved, that's also not so good, but if it is EVEN WEAKER, then patches must patch up atleast that! I don't know if any other program was that much weaker than TWO upgrades earlier! S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.