Author: John Warfield
Date: 12:48:44 01/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2000 at 14:41:41, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 26, 2000 at 13:20:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On January 26, 2000 at 12:33:37, John Warfield wrote: >> >>> I agree about his tastless remarks Chris, in a earlier post he told me the >>>"drop Dead". Ofcourse complaining to the moderators is a waste of time so I did >>>not do so. Hyatt has all the moderators in his back pocket. Bruce moreland is >>>obviously a personal friend of his, so he has protection there. They would >>>rather throw 50 people out of this forum then expel hyatt, so i feel for you >>>pal. I notice that you have respected everyone here and I have never heard you >>>make a nasty or even sarcastic comment to anyone, it is a shame that you have no >>>recourse. >> >>I'm tired of being accused of this kind of stuff by everyone who has had >>conflict with Bob, whenever someone else has conflict with Bob. >> >>I am personal friends with a lot of people here. I'm also on the outs a lot of >>the time with some of the people here. I've been fighting with Thorsten for >>five years, for instance. But Thorsten is also still here, despite numerous >>complaints, some justified. >> >>I don't like Bob's style a lot of the time, but he spends a lot of time >>embattled, and sometimes overreacts, especially when provoked. The exact same >>thing is true of Thorsten. The similarities are startling, despite the enormous >>differences. >> >>There was no moderator email complaint this time. I believe that I found the >>part that bothers Chris Carson. Bob called him "petty" (an overreaction), in >>response to light provocation, after Chris was irritated by Bob and Peter >>Gillgasch. I don't think that any of the posts deserve deletion. I sent email >>to Bob and Chris about it. >> >>bruce > >My, how tempers rise. Thing is, in the posts you mentioned, Chris poked first. >Sure, Bob usually "rises to the occasion", but he had answered the question with >a fact, and then speculation. First he said that "In Hsu's case, he can't >_really_ give an exact nps, because the hardware processors don't count nodes." >and then tried to explain how he thought the number was reached. Chris ignored >this and made it clear he thought Bob didn't know what he was talking about. >Since some of the explanation contained "Hsu said" this sounds a little unjust, >and Bob poked back. Nothing too serious. Just egos bumping into each other, but >hardly justifying leaving altogether. I hope Chris will cool off and reconsider. > > Albert Silver Come on Albert!, I like you and everything but I can't help but notice that you seem to take hyatt's side on practically every issue. I can't see Chris as provoking anything, as he is one of the most mellowest people I have heard here.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.