Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: is the

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 11:36:12 07/20/98

Go up one level in this thread



On July 20, 1998 at 14:30:47, Dan Newman wrote:

>I think I've seen this priming-the-pump effect--though perhaps not as
>pronounced as a 4% change in node rate.  Is it due to branch prediction
>being pre-set by the first run or some sort of alignment variation?

I don't know.  4% seems like a lot, but I've seen several percent at least,
discounting any disk I/O which would be cached on later runs, and could of
course result in even more difference.

I'm not a hardware guy.

>One of the biggest effects I see is that I get a much larger node rate
>the longer I run.  If I run a test for 10 s I might get 170 knps.  If
>I run for 40 s 200 knps.  It does level off of course.  I'm using a
>P6/200, so I've attributed this effect to improving branch prediction
>as the code runs.  Any ideas?

Maybe it has something to do with the deeper search having characterstics that
differ from the shallower search.

bruce



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.