Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:05:29 10/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2002 at 09:44:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 28, 2002 at 09:38:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >I hope you realize that i prefer a time control of 40 in 2. >However, if you play blitz levels like 90 0, then you have >consequences like this. If you asked me in advance, then >i would not have told you to expect that i would get to >move 187 at all in a computer-computer game which was >hand operated. > >Both operators played like 50 moves extra with very little time >on the clock. > >If you do not find it fair to win on time, then don't play 90 0 >is my viewpoint. I prefer 40 in 2 myself too. If you go 90 0, >it is unpreventable that a number of games end in a time win. It is possible to prevent it if you do not play games manually. I see no reason to play games manually. I see no reason not to play the games automatically in ICC. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.