Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: time note

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:05:29 10/28/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 28, 2002 at 09:44:40, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On October 28, 2002 at 09:38:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>I hope you realize that i prefer a time control of 40 in 2.
>However, if you play blitz levels like 90 0, then you have
>consequences like this. If you asked me in advance, then
>i would not have told you to expect that i would get to
>move 187 at all in a computer-computer game which was
>hand operated.
>Both operators played like 50 moves extra with very little time
>on the clock.
>If you do not find it fair to win on time, then don't play 90 0
>is my viewpoint. I prefer 40 in 2 myself too. If you go 90 0,
>it is unpreventable that a number of games end in a time win.

It is possible to prevent it if you do not play games manually.

I see no reason to play games manually.
I see no reason not to play the games automatically in ICC.


This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.