Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessfun and Nunn1 Tests

Author: tony worsman

Date: 08:12:35 05/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


Hi Chessfun/ccc,


Unfortunately due to work commitments, I have not had a chance
to clarify this sooner,  so instead of replying to individual
posts and adding to an already bloated series of threads
i'll just clear up a couple of points here.

chessfun, I did'nt intend to wind you up - honest :-)  and
i'm sure your an earthling really %*}  sorry.

As Internet access is very expensive here during weekdays
I often download a week load of archives, and load the files
into "cccdbnav" for easy navigation of threads.
After reading through your nunn1 threads, in which you posted
over 60 posts yourself, I was left wondering what conclusion
if any, did this long thread show,  and why all the posts,
why not just post the end results ?

The concept was interesting, the work you put into testing
is admirable, im sure many would agree with that point,
but the clinical conditions needed to draw any worthwhile
conclusions were missing - which is a darn shame after all the
testing done.
Having 2 identical  computers, you are in a better
position than most to run some interesting ponder - on
tests,


>From: Dan Kiski
>E-mail: dymkiski@hotmail.com
>Message Number: 109089
<snip>
>I av been looking at whats been going on here to.
>seems mabe tony with the hotmail add is also mabe mogen's?

Sorry to dissapoint you dan, Mogens is not me, nor I him,
If Mogens has a point to make, he makes it using _his_ _own_
 _name_, you should have noticed that, and more eloquently
too, despite English not his first language....Med venlig hilsen...
(the wonders of search & paste - God knows what it means,
nothing rude I hope).


>From: Chessfun
>Message Number: 109122
>Date: May 04, 2000 at 18:45:32
>It is a shame that IP's cannot be part of all posts that way
>at least we would know who is who and it would to some part
>decrease trolls like this thread.

My post certainly wasnt a troll, ok the heavy sarcasm
was perhaps unwarranted, in my opinion the post is
valid, if a distraction from the main issue.
_However_, I post here using _my_ _name_ , I never post
here using a false name or handle. I  aint no troll
and I dont hide under Bridges.

Thanks.

ps. hmmmmm could you Hmmm send me your pgn files. (worth
a try :-0 )




This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.