Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 04:17:44 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 06:24:49, Rick Hagen wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 05:59:41, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 27, 2005 at 05:18:25, Rick Hagen wrote: >> >>> >>>[Event "IPCCC"] >>>[Site "Paderborn"] >>>[Date "2005.02.27"] >>>[Round "9"] >>>[White "Diep"] >>>[Black "Matador"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[PlyCount "41"] >>>[EventDate "2005.??.??"] >>> >>>1. d4 Nf6 2. Nc3 d5 3. f3 e6 4. e4 dxe4 5. fxe4 Bb4 6. a3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 Nxe4 8. >>>Qg4 Nxc3 9. Bd3 g6 10. Nf3 e5 11. Qg3 exd4 12. O-O O-O 13. Bh6 Re8 14. Ng5 Re7 >>>15. Nxh7 Re6 16. Ng5 Rf6 17. Nxf7 Qe7 18. Bg5 Nd5 19. Bc4 Qxf7 20. Bxf6 Be6 21. >>>Bxd4 1-0 >>> >>>:-p >>> >>>Rick >> >>Matador blundered by 12...0-0 >> >>I suspect that this book does not work against shredder that does not like to >>castle and prefer 12...Nc6 >> >>I suspect that 11...exd4 is also bad(shredder does not like it and prefers >>11...0-0 with perpetual check 12.dxe5 Bf5 13.Bxf5 Qd1+ Kf2 Qe2+ Kg1 Qd1+) >> >>I wonder if there is something better than perpetual check for white after >>11...0-0 >> >>Uri >> >>Uri > >Uri, > >I've let Junior9 eval the pos. after 11.Qg3 (since you already used S9) > >Diep - Matador, IPCCC Paderborn 2005 >rnbqk2r/ppp2p1p/6p1/4p3/3P4/P1nB1NQ1/2P3PP/R1B1K2R b KQkq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior 9: (5 min.) > >1. = (-0.03): 11...Nc6 12.Nxe5 >2. = (0.00): 11...0-0 12.dxe5 Bf5 13.Bxf5 Qd1+ 14.Kf2 Qe2+ 15.Kg1 Qd1+ > >(Hagen, MyTown 27.02.2005) > >So, 11...,0-0 seems draw indeed. > >11...,ed4 is suicide > >Rick Well, Vincent said that if an engine play Elo 3000 than the book is giving in these tournaments 700 points and the program is 2300 Elo strong. I do not think Diep is playing Elo 3000 so the Vincent's rule cannot be used. Sandro
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.