Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:36:34 04/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 29, 2004 at 13:22:15, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 29, 2004 at 11:28:04, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On April 29, 2004 at 04:09:43, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On April 28, 2004 at 19:25:34, ERIQ wrote: >>> >>>>On April 28, 2004 at 14:30:13, Chris Taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>The latest and greatest did really well, in the last computer contest. So, will a Windows version (XP or lesser) be made ready for buying? >>>> >>>>amazing! there is one buyer :) >>>> >>>>>I have my credit card ready? I can even send a postal order, or cheque! >>>> >>>>wow!! >>>> >>>>>It will make a nice addition to an already growing pile of Chess Stuff! >>>> >>>>not sure why?! but to each his own. >>>> >>>>IMO. diep couldn't beat it's way out of a paper bag in the middle of a rain >>>>storm, what would be the purpose in buying it? >>> >>>The recent tournaments have shown that Shredder is one leap ahead of all other >>>engines. I also know this based on my own experiments, as Shredder 8 is the only >>>engine that consistently scores above 50% against Falcon in my tests. >> >>That is a red flag. If Shredder is the _only_ engine that beats you in your >>tests, I'd personally be very concerned that my testing is badly flawed. IE if >>you can consistently beat fritz, you are doing something nobody else (except >>perhaps shredder) is doing... > >Saying that shredder is the only engine that consistently scores above 50% >against Falcon does not means that Falcon can consistently beat Fritz and it may >get exactly 50% against Fritz. > >Uri 50% or 51% really doesn't matter. Either result seems far beyond any reality I can imagine.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.