Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 08:41:04 07/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2004 at 11:38:31, Peter Berger wrote: >On July 14, 2004 at 11:26:47, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On July 14, 2004 at 11:12:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>Not at all, Omid >>>If you already have a parallel engine you should run it into a hardware capable >>>of getting all its power. >> >>I understand that you are going to provide the hardware, right? >> >>It is not something personal; next year I will have the needed hardware, but >>what about others? Deep Sjeng and ParSOS were also parallel engines, but ran on >>single processor not because they thought it was better, but because they did >>not have access to a fast multiprocessor machine. >> > >I wonder what except the results changed from two weeks ago to now to make you >imply this is an unfair event and go on raving about it ?! > >Weren't you even one of the organizers? Yes, and I complained loudly about it even before the event. > >The multi-processor entries got the first 5 places in the tournament - this was >partly unexpected by some, probably including you. Had you been aware of it >before the event you probably would have tried to get better hardware in case >your engine can use it successfully. Every other answer is a bit hard to believe >for me. > >Peter
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.