Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 22:05:20 01/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
>2 ) 1/2 hour per player per game - ChessTiger would beat everyone but would lose >some games > I'd still take Kasparov or Anand in a G/30 match against any micro, though it would certainly be competitive. FWIW, I think most people underestimate the talent gap between someone like Kasparov and an ordinary GM. The rating difference is roughly 300 points, which is a massive difference in strength. >3 ) 1 hour per player per game - Things become closer > I think the super GMs (top 10 in the world) would be clearly ahead here. --Peter
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.