Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 18:37:25 04/02/98
Hi -
I want to show you a very nice 40/120 game from my home...
CSTal played vs. Fritz5, both commercially available CD-versions having
k6/200, fritz5 with 44MB hash
(187.000 NPS), Cstal with 12MB hash(3500 NPS).
This is the 10th tournament game between the 2 programs I have played so
far.
The idea behind playing own manually outplayed game material with fritz5
is to show that the CB-autoplayer
produces results that are not realistic although they are reproducable
as many people have claimed (I have not
proofed this myself so far).
Although this game is only a draw, it shows perfectly what I mean when I
talk about fritz playing like a blind
in a desert. Planless, short-range chess without any idea about the
position and it needs.
I will later publish all my games of this opponent and also other
opponents that played vs. fritz5.
My results build a complete different elo than the ssdf-guys claim. I
don't know why, but we will find out.
Moritz Berger once calculated an ELO for CSTal arround 2250 ELO.
If Fritz5 has REALLY this high ssdf-elo, how would a match between the 2
programs end after 30 or 50 or 100
games ?!? I take your bets.... Moritz once told me about a match he had
done with a very very negative score
against cstal. I never believed these results. And - of course - was
unable to reproduce similar results at my
home.
Here is the fritz5 pgn-output:
[Event "k6/200 40/120"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1998.04.03"]
[Round "10"]
[White "CSTal"]
[Black "Fritz5"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C95"]
[Annotator "CSTal"]
[PlyCount "94"]
{44032kB, f5book.ctg
} 1. e4 {0} 1... e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {4} 2... Nc6 {0} 3. Bb5 {5
} 3... a6 {0} 4. Ba4 {4} 4... Nf6 {0} 5. O-O {5} 5... Be7 {0} 6. Re1 {5}
6...
b5 {0} 7. Bb3 {5} 7... d6 {0} 8. c3 {5} 8... O-O {0} 9. h3 {6} 9... Nb8
{0} 10.
d4 {6} 10... Nbd7 {0} 11. Nbd2 {5} 11... Bb7 {0} 12. Bc2 {4} 12... Re8
{0} 13.
Nf1 {4} 13... Bf8 {0} 14. Ng3 {5} 14... g6 {0} 15. a4 {4} 15... c5 {0}
16. d5 {
5} 16... c4 {0} 17. Bg5 {5} 17... h6 {0} 18. Be3 {5} 18... Nc5 {0} 19.
Qd2 {4}
19... h5 {0} 20. Ng5 {6} 20... Bh6 {0} 21. Re2 {4} 21... Qe7 {0} 22.
Rae1 {5}
22... h4 {0} 23. Nf1 {5} 23... Nh5 {0} 24. g3 {5} 24... hxg3 {0} 25.
fxg3 {4}
25... f6 {0} 26. g4 {16} 26... Nf4 {-0.50/13 495} 27. Bxf4 {20} 27...
exf4 {
-0.50/11 69} 28. Nf3 {547} 28... Qd7 {-0.06/12 133} 29. a5 {330} 29...
Qc7 {
-0.13/13 721} 30. g5 {697} 30... fxg5 {-0.56/12 519} 31. e5 {100} 31...
Qxa5 {
-0.59/12 601} 32. Bxg6 {460} 32... Qb6 {-0.72/12 230} 33. Qd4 {303}
33... Re7 {
-0.94/12 199} 34. e6 {343} 34... Bg7 {-0.91/13 805} 35. Qf2 {52} 35...
Bf6 {
-0.72/12 499} 36. N1h2 {113} 36... Kg7 {-0.66/12 686} 37. h4 {630} 37...
Kxg6 {
-1.44/12 401} 38. hxg5 {50} 38... Bg7 {-0.81/12 673} 39. Nh4+ {22} 39...
Kh7 {
-0.50/13 757} 40. Nf5 {5} 40... Rae8 {0.00/11 403} 41. Ng4 {157} 41...
Na4 {
0.13/10 53} 42. Re3 {44} 42... fxe3 {0.00/10 174} 43. Qh2+ {130} 43...
Kg6 {
0.00/12 46} 44. Nh4+ {101} 44... Kh7 {0.00/14 160} 45. Nf5+ {95} 45...
Kg8 {
0.00/13 124} 46. Nfh6+ {201} 46... Kh8 {0.00/13 28} 47. Nf5+ {293} 47...
Kg8 {
0.00/20 283} 1/2-1/2
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.