Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 13:16:41 09/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2001 at 15:22:35, Chessfun wrote: >On September 02, 2001 at 14:24:32, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>It's hard to detect that there is no penetration, no pawn break, and no problem >>caused by the fact that white is tied down due to the protected passer. >> >>If the q-side pawns were blocked, it might be possible to figure this out >>easily, but it's not easy to teach a computer to resolve the crippled 3 vs 2 >>that's happening over there now. >> >>If it's black to move, does any program try 1. ... b3? All of my computers are >>busy, so I can't tell. I don't know if this wins, but it is clearly the only >>try. >> >>Can you or someone else run Fine 70 for me with these programs and report the >>results? I'm interested that Fritz is getting so deep in this pawn ending, and >>I wonder if it can find this. >> >>[D]8/k/3p/p2P1p/P2P1P/16/K w - - 0 1 >> >>bruce > >All programs ran for about 6 mins on TB 945 mhz. >ChessTiger 14, Gambit 2.0, Deep Fritz, Fritz 6, Junior 7, >CMFun and Fritz 6. I'm sorry to waste your time but I had a bogus FEN. This one is correct: [D]8/k7/3p4/p2P1p2/P2P1P2/8/8/K7 w - - 0 1 bruce
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.