Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:11:18 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 19, 2002 at 12:25:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 11:35:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Bitboards have a bit of a performance advantage on 64 bit processors, > >Proof? > >-- >GCP Counter-proof? Seems intuitively obvious to me. Bitmaps seem to suffer _no_ performance penalty on X86 with 32 bits, compared to 0x88. Seems intuitively obvious to me that they will pick up speed on a machine that does 64 bit operations. Bruce and I did this comparison when he used the alpha in the WMCCC (1997 I think). He re-compiled ferret for the alpha, did the same for Crafty. My speed improvement was significantly better than his on the _same_ machine. Because of the 64 bit stuff. His program didn't need any 64 bit stuff so it was wasted... Best "proof" is to try it. I have...

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Vincent Diepeveen***11:24:04 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***11:34:21 11/19/02*- significant math
**Vincent Diepeveen***12:04:15 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:09:47 11/19/02* - Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***12:15:56 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***12:37:24 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***13:08:58 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:18:48 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***02:05:25 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***02:37:43 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***02:44:10 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***07:57:01 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***08:07:32 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***08:15:17 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***08:39:14 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***13:52:38 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***14:58:33 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***15:58:54 11/20/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***11:11:57 11/20/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***04:13:51 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***04:35:46 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***06:37:11 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Gerd Isenberg***12:17:57 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Steffan Westcott***15:15:49 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Gerd Isenberg***23:32:50 11/20/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***09:55:07 11/20/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Steffan Westcott***14:57:12 11/20/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***02:55:59 11/21/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Steffan Westcott***03:47:24 11/21/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***12:23:55 11/21/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Steffan Westcott***16:17:46 11/21/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***23:49:05 11/21/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Gerd Isenberg***04:42:51 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***08:53:54 11/22/02* - Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Sune Fischer***08:37:56 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Gerd Isenberg***10:20:35 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Sune Fischer***13:17:29 11/22/02*

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***08:58:34 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Sune Fischer***09:19:42 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***09:52:54 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Steffan Westcott***16:08:27 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***16:44:52 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Steffan Westcott***17:19:09 11/22/02*

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Sune Fischer***10:38:50 11/22/02*- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***11:01:19 11/22/02*

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Alessandro Damiani***00:24:24 11/22/02*

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)
**Daniel Clausen***03:55:11 11/21/02*

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math)

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***13:27:31 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:30:28 11/19/02* - Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:29:49 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Dan Andersson***13:14:07 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***13:22:14 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Dan Andersson***20:54:40 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***22:06:34 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Dan Andersson***01:00:20 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***07:59:33 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Dan Andersson***13:52:11 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***15:34:35 11/20/02* - Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***14:37:08 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Vincent Diepeveen***21:00:13 11/21/02*- Re: significant math
**Sune Fischer***03:24:41 11/22/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Uri Blass***22:50:38 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***08:01:29 11/20/02* - Re: significant math
**Uri Blass***22:52:20 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:24:36 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:31:33 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:33:40 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:42:21 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:51:35 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:53:48 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Eugene Nalimov***14:15:46 11/19/02* - Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:59:29 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***15:03:28 11/19/02*- Re: ftp news
**Robert Hyatt***15:37:42 11/20/02* - Re: ftp news
**Robert Hyatt***15:36:58 11/20/02*

- Re: ftp news
- Re: significant math
**Eugene Nalimov***14:16:28 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***13:38:03 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:43:31 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***13:31:15 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Alessandro Damiani***13:55:55 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Vincent Diepeveen***16:13:39 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Jeremiah Penery***17:23:11 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Alessandro Damiani***00:44:20 11/20/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***08:02:55 11/20/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***17:09:11 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Uri Blass***17:35:18 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Russell Reagan***19:24:36 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***17:06:00 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:38:37 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Robert Hyatt***13:51:36 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:56:35 11/19/02*- Re: significant math
**Gerd Isenberg***14:25:26 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math
- Re: significant math
**Bob Durrett***13:37:33 11/19/02*

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- Re: significant math

- significant math

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***11:17:42 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***11:27:26 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***11:33:53 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Russell Reagan***11:53:45 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***11:56:27 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***13:07:08 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:18:01 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Russell Reagan***13:34:46 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***13:36:23 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***13:48:55 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Anthony Cozzie***23:11:03 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***08:04:27 11/20/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Dave Gomboc***21:07:35 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***22:09:44 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Gian-Carlo Pascutto***14:07:41 11/19/02*- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***20:13:33 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Russell Reagan***13:39:54 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***13:27:34 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Russell Reagan***12:17:32 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?
**Robert Hyatt***11:38:43 11/19/02*

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

- Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

This page took 0.99 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.